AlternativeTo is a free service that helps you find better alternatives to the products you love and hate. The site is made by Ola and Markus in Sweden, with a lot of help from our friends and colleagues in Italy, Finland, USA, Colombia, Philippines, France and contributors from all over the world. That's right, all the lists of alternatives are crowd-sourced, and that's what makes the data.

How does EditPlus compare to other text editors with similar feature sets? If you've switched to EditPlus from another comparable editor, or if you've left EditPlus in the dust, describe why here.Please notice that EditPlus has a customizable Auto-Complete feature that other text editors might not have and they, therefore, would not compare this feature in their feature comparing matrix. And the indent-wrap feature (the wrapped lines are also indented) is mostly lacking in other editors.Wikipedia also features a. Contents.Alternative editors for Windows Boxer. (shareware)Boxer is definitely a full-featured editor that's worth a look. Whether or not one prefers it to EditPlus will be a matter of personal preference. There's a complete list of Boxer's features.HTML Kit.

(shareware)jEdit. (GPL license)jEdit is free. It is written in Java, so it runs on Mac OS X, OS/2, Unix, VMS and Windows. This also means that is is slower than EditPlus. It is missing some EditPlus functionality, but it has a number of advantages:.

Abe manual introduction to business. The best part? As a Chegg Study subscriber, you can view available interactive solutions manuals for each of your classes for one low monthly price. Bookmark it to easily review again before an exam.

Built-in macro language; extensible plugin architecture. Dozens of macros and plugins available.

Plugins can be downloaded and installed from within jEdit using the 'plugin manager' feature. Auto indent, and syntax highlighting for 122 languages. Folding for selectively hiding regions of text. Highly configurable and customizable.TextPad.

(shareware)(A new version of TextPad v5.0 was released in March 2007.)Two words: file comparison.Textpad is also a very good text editor. However, development on it has languished - the last release was June '04. It does have a built in file comparison tool, but lacks builtin FTP support, which is what led me to switch to Editplus.Also, the shortcuts are not standardized. Ctrl+F does not open the search box but starts a search with the previously used search term (unless you switch to Microsoft compatibility mode in the settings screens).UltraEdit. (shareware)UltraEdit has a built in FTP and SFTP feature, which works OK. It also has the rest of the features, even though they have not been attached to convenient shortcuts. The text editor as such is not the greatest, but it does the job.

There are a few screen bugs when scrolling and selecting. The syntax highlight is completely customizable but acting 'weird' at times.Additionally, it has the very useful ability to edit 'Raw' files, that is, you can edit the file in Hex format, byte by byte.The syntax highlight is very customizable upto a point - but not flexible enough for some. And over-complicated too.The search feature has a useful 'list lines containing string' option. Only.

reason to use this over editplus is the code-folding and the Color Selector.EditPad. (shareware). (free for non commercial use, not open source)PSPad. (freeware, not open source)Excellent editor with many interesting features which include ability to script using JavaScript, and the Code Explorer.SciTE.

(freeware, open source)'SciTE is a SCIntilla based Text Editor. Originally built to demonstrate Scintilla, it has grown to be a generally useful editor with facilities for building and running programs. It is best used for jobs with simple configurations - I use it for building test and demonstration programs as well as SciTE and Scintilla, themselves.'